I
ianelliott
VIP Member
- Messages
- 4
Hi,
My wife has just been issued with a "notice of intended prosecution" for doing 73 mph on the A34 dual carriageway near Whitchurch. The speed limit for cars is 70 mph but I would not expect them to issue a penalty notice for 73 mph since a 10% grace is usually applied, meaning they would not normally prosecute below 77 mph.
However, she was driving our California and the police are trying to classify this as a "Goods Vehicle" and claiming the speed limit is 60 mph rather than 70 mph. In my opinion this is just factually incorrect!
I will check with the legal department of the RAC on Monday but has anyone encountered this before? We have the VW bike rack permanently fixed on the back so it is unlikely they really thought it was a goods vehicle. I must say I feel this is somewhat harsh ... in my experience you would have to wait less than 2 minutes before a vehicle passed through that stretch of road at 85 mph or more!
Thanks for any advice,
Ian Elliott
My wife has just been issued with a "notice of intended prosecution" for doing 73 mph on the A34 dual carriageway near Whitchurch. The speed limit for cars is 70 mph but I would not expect them to issue a penalty notice for 73 mph since a 10% grace is usually applied, meaning they would not normally prosecute below 77 mph.
However, she was driving our California and the police are trying to classify this as a "Goods Vehicle" and claiming the speed limit is 60 mph rather than 70 mph. In my opinion this is just factually incorrect!
I will check with the legal department of the RAC on Monday but has anyone encountered this before? We have the VW bike rack permanently fixed on the back so it is unlikely they really thought it was a goods vehicle. I must say I feel this is somewhat harsh ... in my experience you would have to wait less than 2 minutes before a vehicle passed through that stretch of road at 85 mph or more!
Thanks for any advice,
Ian Elliott