Buy all your VW California Accessories at the Club Shop Visit Shop

Which electric car to buy?

Love the Honda as a piece of design, but its price/range ratio would make it a heart choice. That same heart would I think be tempted by an Abarth 500e instead (about 130miles range real world)
View attachment 104839
Although I was genuinely mesmerised by the lines of the forthcoming electric Renault 5 at Goodwood. These images of the Alpine R5 have mashed it with a daft spoiler but I felt a real and unexpected nostalgia for the old 5, particularly the GT Turbo of course.
View attachment 104841
For longer journeys I’d agree it has to be Tesla. But if I had £107,000 burning a hole, I’d test drive an i7 (about 300 miles range real world)
View attachment 104840
Abarth and Alpine trying to look as sporty as they can, and why not..
I'm not fooled though, probably driving experience equivalent to riding down
the road in a fridge. A wine fridge with a window.
 
I'm not fooled though, probably driving experience equivalent to riding down
the road in a fridge. A wine fridge with a window.
Same for all EV's truth be told. At least the Abarth has synthesised ICE sound effects :thumb
 
Same for all EV's truth be told. At least the Abarth has synthesised ICE sound effects :thumb
But you’d have to put up with the stupid guitar riff that sounds every time you go over 20 kph :eek:
 
The whole point of the Abarth is that it sounds like a Lambo (sort of). Otherwise it's just a 500 . One 500 abarth raced me on the autobahn once. You should have seen how disappointed the face of the guy looked when past 210km/h on a uphill stretch I continued to accelerate with my diesel truck (Q7) and he couldn' keep up and became increasingly small in my rearview mirror. Needless to say he never cought up with me.
Point is EV abarth doesn't make sense if it doesn't have that ICE grunt!
 
Point is EV abarth doesn't make sense if it doesn't have that ICE grunt!
Actually the EV Abarth has more 'grunt' compared to the ICE. In terms of torque the specs are 235 vs 231 Nm, respectively. I wouldn't kick one out of bed.
 
Actually the EV Abarth has more 'grunt' compared to the ICE. In terms of torque the specs are 235 vs 231 Nm, respectively. I wouldn't kick one out of bed.
Sorry, I meant "grunt" from the sound point of view. 4Nm more pushing how many more Kg due to battery ?

I seen more point on the R5, as the original R5 didn't have a "grunt" sound either, being Turbo..
 
The Unicorn farmers in Brussels have decided that from 2035
there should be no more ICE cars built.
So this thread is gonna run and run..
A sad time for me.
 
The Unicorn farmers in Brussels have decided that from 2035
there should be no more ICE cars built.
So this thread is gonna run and run..
A sad time for me.

I’m not sure why this is a bad thing…?
 
I choose Scalextric! On the other hand, it might not be such a stupid idea to put a best before date on the sale of petrol and diesel powered cars.
 
Well. We’re not building any new roads in Wales (although a few have been granted special status) so i suggest a good multimedia system in any new car as some journeys are going to take forever! Also, good hard-wearing suspension as some of the potholes are the size of open cast mines from times gone bye.
There is an expectation that any children born after 2030 will have wings and the ability to fly - after paying their flight tax.
 
There is an expectation that any children born after 2030 will have wings and the ability to fly - after paying their flight tax.
By the time even children born in 2023 reach adulthood it's unlikely that the majority of them will have an interest in owning a car, or will have taken a driving test. The numbers are already trending downwards in the UK, the US and elsewhere (there's a piece about that in this week's Economist for anyone that has a sub).

Our generation grew up seeing driving as an essential life skill and car ownership as a universal aspiration. But we'd would be foolish to assume that our children and grandchildren think the same way. Many of them already don't. Those wanting to live in very rural areas will want to drive and own a vehicle, but for the majority daily travel will be within the range of public transport (including, eventually, driverless taxi-on-demand systems).

While our generation are still able to keep drive our quaint old motors to the polling station in fair numbers, there will be enough votes to keep private car ownership taxed at not much more than it currently is. But after that, the mainstream electorate will favour spending on a blend of public transportation and the necessary infrastructure. If you choose to live in the sticks, there will still be options, but don't expect the urban majority to subsidise that, or expect your grandchildren to come and visit you.

Other predictions about the future are available, of course.
 
Well. We’re not building any new roads in Wales (although a few have been granted special status)

For once it seems like a sensible decision by the Welsh government.

No new roads until the active travel alternatives have been properly considered. Why spend £millions on an around town bypass when you can reduce traffic by building an across town segregated cycle trail for £thousands.
 
By the time even children born in 2023 reach adulthood it's unlikely that the majority of them will have an interest in owning a car, or will have taken a driving test. The numbers are already trending downwards in the UK, the US and elsewhere (there's a piece about that in this week's Economist for anyone that has a sub).

Our generation grew up seeing driving as an essential life skill and car ownership as a universal aspiration. But we'd would be foolish to assume that our children and grandchildren think the same way. Many of them already don't. Those wanting to live in very rural areas will want to drive and own a vehicle, but for the majority daily travel will be within the range of public transport (including, eventually, driverless taxi-on-demand systems).

While our generation are still able to keep drive our quaint old motors to the polling station in fair numbers, there will be enough votes to keep private car ownership taxed at not much more than it currently is. But after that, the mainstream electorate will favour spending on a blend of public transportation and the necessary infrastructure. If you choose to live in the sticks, there will still be options, but don't expect the urban majority to subsidise that, or expect your grandchildren to come and visit you.

Other predictions about the future are available, of course.
So is the aim to depopulate the countryside and build mega urban areas? If there is no one in the countryside how are the maga urban areas going to get food? Who is going to grow and produce it?
 
So is the aim to depopulate the countryside and build mega urban areas? If there is no one in the countryside how are the maga urban areas going to get food? Who is going to grow and produce it?
You make it sound like it's all some megalomaniacal master plan. Governments can only respond, as best they can, to profound long-run shifts in demographics, social attitudes and preferences, and (crucially) technological developments.

Since 1900 the percentage of the UK population living in urban areas has increased from about 30% to more than 80% today, due to those inexorable shifts in economic and social structures.

If you're worried about food security, that doesn't require a large rural population. Currently only about 1% of the UK working population are needed to farm the 70% of the UK's land that is designated as agricultural, and that labour need will fall further with progressive farm mechanisation. So there's no pressing economic need to have a large proportion of the population living in the countryside. If they want to live there, fine, but I don't see why electorates of the future will want to subsidise them to do so.
 
Back
Top